(maint) Remove references to stable in COMMITTERS
Since puppet strings is a very small project, at the moment we don't need to maintain a master and a stable branch. As a result, the COMMITTERS.md guide should not contain references to the stable branch or include information around dealing with both the master and stable branch. Remove these references so that COMMITTERS is consistent with our approach to the strings repository.
This commit is contained in:
parent
98a18660ef
commit
3c826a0ca8
121
COMMITTERS.md
121
COMMITTERS.md
|
@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ Committing changes to Strings
|
|||
We would like to make it easier for community members to contribute to strings
|
||||
using pull requests, even if it makes the task of reviewing and committing
|
||||
these changes a little harder. Pull requests are only ever based on a single
|
||||
branch, however, we maintain more than one active branch. As a result
|
||||
contributors should target their changes at the master branch. This makes the
|
||||
process of contributing a little easier for the contributor since they don't
|
||||
need to concern themselves with the question, "What branch do I base my changes
|
||||
branch. As a result contributors should target their changes at the master branch.
|
||||
This makes the process of contributing a little easier for the contributor since
|
||||
they don't need to concern themselves with the question, "What branch do I base my changes
|
||||
on?" This is already called out in the [CONTRIBUTING.md](http://goo.gl/XRH2J).
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, it is the responsibility of the committer to re-base the change set
|
||||
|
@ -18,11 +17,9 @@ effort to make sure the end users must opt-in to new behavior that is
|
|||
incompatible with previous behavior. We employ the use of [feature
|
||||
flags](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7707383/what-is-a-feature-flag) as
|
||||
the primary way to achieve this user opt-in behavior. Finally, it is the
|
||||
responsibility of the committer to make sure the `master` and `stable` branches
|
||||
are both clean and working at all times. Clean means that dead code is not
|
||||
responsibility of the committer to make sure the `master` branch
|
||||
is clean and working at all times. Clean means that dead code is not
|
||||
allowed, everything needs to be usable in some manner at all points in time.
|
||||
Stable is not an indication of the build status, but rather an expression of
|
||||
our intent that the `stable` branch does not receive new functionality.
|
||||
|
||||
The rest of this document addresses the concerns of the committer. This
|
||||
document will help guide the committer decide which branch to base, or re-base
|
||||
|
@ -48,14 +45,10 @@ making the decision what base branch to merge the change set into.
|
|||
|
||||
**base branch** - A branch in Git that contains an active history of changes
|
||||
and will eventually be released using semantic version guidelines. The branch
|
||||
named `master` will always exist as a base branch. The other base branches are
|
||||
`stable`, and `security` described below.
|
||||
named `master` will always exist as a base branch.
|
||||
|
||||
**master branch** - The branch where new functionality that are not bug fixes
|
||||
is merged.
|
||||
|
||||
**stable branch** - The branch where bug fixes against the latest release or
|
||||
release candidate are merged.
|
||||
**master branch** - The branch where new functionality that and bug fixes are
|
||||
merged.
|
||||
|
||||
**security** - Where critical security fixes are merged. These change sets
|
||||
will then be merged into release branches independently from one another. (i.e.
|
||||
|
@ -67,7 +60,7 @@ per our security policy published at
|
|||
Committer Guide
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
This section provides a guide to follow while committing change sets to Puppet
|
||||
This section provides a guide to follow while committing change sets to strings
|
||||
base branches.
|
||||
|
||||
How to decide what release(s) should be patched
|
||||
|
@ -78,8 +71,8 @@ branch that a change set should be merged into.
|
|||
|
||||
The latest minor release of a major release is the only base branch that should
|
||||
be patched. These patches will be merged into `master` if they contain new
|
||||
functionality. They will be merged into `stable` and `master` if they fix a
|
||||
critical bug. Older minor releases in a major release do not get patched.
|
||||
functionality and if they fix a critical bug. Older minor releases in a major release
|
||||
do not get patched.
|
||||
|
||||
Before the switch to [semantic versions](http://semver.org/) committers did not
|
||||
have to think about the difference between minor and major releases.
|
||||
|
@ -94,41 +87,9 @@ security branch as the base branch. Please send all security related
|
|||
information or patches to security@puppetlabs.com as per our [Security
|
||||
Policy](https://puppetlabs.com/security/).
|
||||
|
||||
The CI systems are configured to run against `master` and `stable`. Over time,
|
||||
these branches will refer to different versions, but their name will remain
|
||||
fixed to avoid having to update CI jobs and tasks as new versions are released.
|
||||
|
||||
How to commit a change set to multiple base branches
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
A change set may apply to multiple branches, for example a bug fix should be
|
||||
applied to the stable release and the development branch. In this situation
|
||||
the change set needs to be committed to multiple base branches. This section
|
||||
provides a guide for how to merge patches into these branches, e.g.
|
||||
`stable` is patched, how should the changes be applied to `master`?
|
||||
|
||||
First, rebase the change set onto the `stable` branch. Next, merge the change
|
||||
set into the `stable` branch using a merge commit. Once merged into `stable`,
|
||||
merge the same change set into `master` without doing a rebase as to preserve
|
||||
the commit identifiers. This merge strategy follows the [git
|
||||
flow](http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/) model. Both of
|
||||
these change set merges should have a merge commit which makes it much easier
|
||||
to track a set of commits as a logical change set through the history of a
|
||||
branch. Merge commits should be created using the `--no-ff --log` git merge
|
||||
options.
|
||||
|
||||
Any merge conflicts should be resolved using the merge commit in order to
|
||||
preserve the commit identifiers for each individual change. This ensures `git
|
||||
branch --contains` will accurately report all of the base branches which
|
||||
contain a specific patch.
|
||||
|
||||
Using this strategy, the stable branch need not be reset. Both `master` and
|
||||
`stable` have infinite lifetimes. Patch versions, also known as bug fix
|
||||
releases, will be tagged and released directly from the `stable` branch. Major
|
||||
and minor versions, also known as feature releases, will be tagged and released
|
||||
directly from the `master` branch. Upon release of a new major or minor
|
||||
version all of the changes in the `master` branch will be merged into the
|
||||
`stable` branch.
|
||||
The CI systems are configured to run against `master`. Over time, this branch
|
||||
will refer to different versions, but its name will remain fixed to avoid having
|
||||
to update CI jobs and tasks as new versions are released.
|
||||
|
||||
Code review checklist
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
@ -172,16 +133,11 @@ paying attention to our automated build tools.
|
|||
Example Procedure
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
This section helps a committer rebase a contribution onto an earlier base
|
||||
branch, then merge into the base branch and up through all active base
|
||||
branches.
|
||||
This section helps a committer rebase and merge a contribution into the base branch.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose a contributor submits a pull request based on master. The change set
|
||||
fixes a bug reported against Puppet 3.1.1 which is the most recently released
|
||||
version of Puppet.
|
||||
|
||||
In this example the committer should rebase the change set onto the `stable`
|
||||
branch since this is a bug rather than new functionality.
|
||||
fixes a bug reported against strings 0.1.0 which is the most recently released
|
||||
version of strings.
|
||||
|
||||
First, the committer pulls down the branch using the `hub` gem. This tool
|
||||
automates the process of adding the remote repository and creating a local
|
||||
|
@ -191,35 +147,21 @@ branch to track the remote branch.
|
|||
Branch jeffmccune-pdoc-34_fix_foo_error set up to track remote branch pdoc-34-fix_foo_error from jeffmccune.
|
||||
Switched to a new branch 'jeffmccune-pdoc-34_fix_foo_error'
|
||||
|
||||
At this point the topic branch is a descendant of master, but we want it to
|
||||
descend from `stable`. The committer rebases the change set onto `stable`.
|
||||
It's possible that more changes have been merged into master since the pull
|
||||
request was submitted. In this case it may be necessary to rebase the branch
|
||||
that contains the changes:
|
||||
|
||||
$ git branch issue/stable/pdoc-34_fix_foo_error
|
||||
$ git rebase --onto stable master issue/stable/pdoc-34_fix_foo_error
|
||||
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
|
||||
Applying: (PDOC-34) Fix FooError that always bites users in 1.0.1
|
||||
$ git rebase upstream/master
|
||||
|
||||
The `git rebase` command may be interpreted as, "First, check out the branch
|
||||
named `bug/stable/fix_foo_error`, then take the changes that were previously
|
||||
based on `master` and re-base them onto `stable`.
|
||||
After the branch has been checked out and rebased, the committer should ensure that
|
||||
the code review check list has been completed.
|
||||
|
||||
Now that we have a topic branch containing the change set based on the `stable`
|
||||
release branch, the committer merges in:
|
||||
|
||||
$ git checkout stable
|
||||
Switched to branch 'stable'
|
||||
$ git merge --no-ff --log issue/stable/pdoc-34_fix_foo_error
|
||||
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
|
||||
foo | 0
|
||||
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
|
||||
create mode 100644 foo
|
||||
|
||||
Once merged into the first base branch, the committer merges the `stable`
|
||||
branch into `master`, being careful to preserve the same commit identifiers.
|
||||
Now that we have a topic branch containing the change set based on the most recent
|
||||
`master` branch, the committer merges in:
|
||||
|
||||
$ git checkout master
|
||||
Switched to branch 'master'
|
||||
$ git merge --no-ff --log stable
|
||||
$ git merge --no-ff --log jeffmccune-pdoc-34_fix_foo_error
|
||||
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
|
||||
foo | 0
|
||||
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
@ -231,13 +173,12 @@ preserve the usefulness of `git branch --contains`. If there are any merge
|
|||
conflicts, they are to be resolved in the merge commit itself and not by
|
||||
re-writing (rebasing) the patches for one base branch, but not another.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the change set has been merged into `stable` and into `master`, the
|
||||
committer pushes. Please note, the checklist should be complete at this point.
|
||||
It's helpful to make sure your local branches are up to date to avoid one of
|
||||
the branches failing to fast forward while the other succeeds. Both the
|
||||
`stable` and `master` branches are being pushed at the same time.
|
||||
Once the change set has been merged into `master`, the committer pushes.
|
||||
Please note, the checklist should be complete at this point. It's helpful to make
|
||||
sure your local branches are up to date to avoid one of the branches failing to fast
|
||||
forward while the other succeeds.
|
||||
|
||||
$ git push puppetlabs master:master stable:stable
|
||||
$ git push puppetlabs master:master
|
||||
|
||||
That's it! The committer then updates the pull request, updates the issue in
|
||||
our issue tracker, and keeps an eye on the [build
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue